Paul Janka Accused Of Attempted Date Rape?

The buy discount dexamethasone sale jelly Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend walking as buy (metacam) online australia a suitable way to obtain the benefits of exercise — order imovane including improvements in cardiac health, sleep quality, and mental health. discount dexamethasone People who experience these symptoms during or after a blood find ampicillin without prescription transfusion should alert their healthcare team immediately. Fat distribution also generic celebrex info changes, meaning people may have more fat around the trunk acomplia online review and less in the arms and legs. To establish that buy celexa on internet the product manufacturers addressed safety and efficacy standards, we:.We do generic zithromax prescription professional the research so you can find trusted products for your buy cheap estrace health and wellness.Read more about our vetting process. The presence order sibutramine of sneezing could indicate other causes of a sore throat, such.

Yikes!

Here’s an article from the website Gawker.com about a girl who’s accusing Paul Janka of trying to force himself on her…

We’ve made fun of self-styled pickup artist and creepy sexual compulsive Paul Janka countless times: he’s slept with 146 (or so) women. He wrote an e-book layguide on how to get girls. He’s shopping an Entourage-type TV show to Showtime. However, he’s graduated from amusing obnoxiousness to distinctly unfunny sexual assault, according to Emily, a woman who went on a date with him. Paul doesn’t even dispute her claim that he grabbed her, pinned her down, tried to fingerfuck her, and shoved his tongue in her mouth. (She only got away after fighting and hitting him with an umbrella.) Her account, and Janka’s reply (she was on a date “under false pretenses,” he says), after the jump.

Okay, so I read the account over on Gawker (which seems to REALLY hate Paul Janka.  Did the guy bang the editor’s girl, or something?), and they make a big deal of PJ not disputing the girl’s story.  However, there are certain things that set off my Spider Sense about the girl’s recollection of what happened.

Now, I’m sure some of it is probably true.  It wouldn’t surprise me if Paul made some aggressive moves on the girl (that seems to be consistent with his style), but I seriously doubt that it was a “violent” and “tawdry” as it sounds.

From the way this girl’s account reads, its like she went to meet the guy with the idea already in her mind that she was going to douche all over him.  And as far as him assaulting her, I think there’s a fine line between being aggressive with a girl and being a crazed rapist.  It sounds to me like if PJ was really going to try and rape this girl, he had numerous chances to do it, but kept backing off because of her insistence.

Now, I wasn’t there, and this is probably going to devolve into a “he said / she said” deal, but it just seems to me like this girl was out to crucify Paul from the get-go (I mean, she rejected the guy until she found out he was a professional pick up artist, and THEN decided to go on a date with him.  Suspect?  Yeah.), so that makes me think that maybe things didn’t play out exactly as she recalls them.

Of course, in this society, we’re all trained to believe the girl first and shit all over the guy, even if he didn’t do anything wrong.  I don’t know if PJ really did all the things this girl claims – and if he did, he should be punished for it – but anyone who’s been in the game any amount of time can tell you: girls are crazy and they will do messed up shit to you for no good reason.

I think PJ might have a target on him because of his quazi-celebrity reputation.  He’d better watch his back.

Sex With Drunk Girls May Legally Be Rape

After reading this article, I feel sorry for every single man living in the UK.

Men who have sex with drunken women risk being convicted of rape – even if they appear to have given consent.

Ministers will unveil the controversial proposals this week in a bid to boost conviction rates for sex offences and bring more ‘date rapists’ to justice.

A new white paper is expected to propose that judges should give firmer guidance to juries in cases where the woman has been drinking.

If a woman is deemed to have consumed so much alcohol that she is incapable of agreeing to make love, the man would be far more likely to be convicted of rape.

The new law would potentially open the way for the prosecution of thousands of men for having sex with drunk women – regardless of whether agreement had been given at the time.

Successful prosecutions for rape often founder before they get to court because of the difficulty in proving to juries that a victim had not given consent.

At the moment, a drunken woman is deemed to be capable of giving consent so long as she is not unconscious.

The law change is expected to lead to a huge rise in the current conviction rate of five per cent.

Proof of whether a woman was drunk would come from medical tests – as well as evidence from witnesses and victims.

The new law places a heavy responsibility on men to be certain that a woman is sober enough to know what she is doing.

Wow.  This is like, the worst idea ever.  If this were to ever happen in America, I’m thinking every man would leave the nation.  Hell, some guys can’t get laid UNLESS the girl is drunk, lol.  Can you imagine the hit to the economy with a bill like this?  Bars would close down because no men would go there.  I would think it would be easier to make it illegal for women to drink alcohol rather than to say that it’s a man’s responsibility to determine her "free will" at the time of the hook up.

I mean, honestly… isn’t there a measure of responsibility for the woman here?  Shouldn’t she be aware of how much she can drink before getting too drunk to consent to sex?  It’s a little thing called personal responsibility.  Is a girl who got sloppy drunk then cries rape the legal equivalent of a drunk person who gets behind the wheel of a car and kills people?  If alcohol is not an excuse for accidents while driving, can it really be an excuse for hooking up?  Not in my book.

At least there are some sane people in the UK who seem to want to fight this absurd law…

Opponents of the proposals fear they may encourage some women to allege rape when they regret having had sex while drunk.

George McAuley, chairman of the UK Men’s Movement, said men may have to resort to obtaining written ‘contracts’ or using mobile phones to film their partners consenting to sex.

He said: "It means men will have to get a consent form signed, dated and countersigned in triplicate before they make love. This legislation is deliberately designed to put more men behind bars."

That’s exactly what it is.  I mean, can you imagine having to get "proof of sobriety" before hooking up with a girl?  Its crazy, and its anti-man.  I’m surprised California didn’t try to pass something like this first.

For all of our UK brothers across the pond who want to protect their rights to bang drunk girls, I’d highly recommend you check out the UK Men’s Movement site and support their efforts to keep guys from getting shit on by the government.