Man Fined For Not Having Sex With His Wife…

Instead generic arcoxia of gendered terms such as "son" or "sister," a person order sale without prescription may want family members to refer to them in different buy buy ways, such as "kid" or "sibling." Aromantic people may identify price of buy with one of these terms in the long term or cheap online pharmacy fluctuate between them, or it may depend on the situation. dexamethasone sale free pharmacy Aromanticism exists on a spectrum, which means that each aromantic buying generic buy person may have a unique definition of what it means lumigan no prescription for them. Some aromantic people may not want to be cheap cialis pill in a relationship at all, while others may want a buy serevent online non-romantic partnership or different types of relationships. People will have buy from india different feelings about whether they would like to engage in sexual.

Ah, those kookie French.  First its their inexplicable love of Jerry Lewis, and now its massive fines for not sexing up your wife…

The 51-year-old man was fined under article 215 of France’s civil code, which states married couples must agree to a “shared communal life”.

A judge has now ruled that this law implies that “sexual relations must form part of a marriage”.

The rare legal decision came after the wife filed for divorce two years ago, blaming the break-up on her husband’s lack of activity in the bedroom.

A judge in Nice, southern France, then granted the divorce and ruled the husband named only as Jean-Louis B. was solely responsible for the split.

But the 47-year-old ex-wife then took him back to court demanding 10,000 euros in compensation for “lack of sex over 21 years of marriage”.
Related Links

The ex-husband claimed “tiredness and health problems” had prevented him from being more attentive between the sheets.

But a judge in the south of France’s highest court in Aix-en-Provence ruled: “A sexual relationship between husband and wife is the expression of affection they have for each other, and in this case it was absent.

“By getting married, couples agree to sharing their life and this clearly implies they will have sex with each other.”

Can you imagine the shitstorm that would occur if MEN could start suing their wives and ex-wives over lack of sex?  I mean, c’mon.  Women with-hold sex CONSTANTLY, especially after marriage.  Why is it some poor French guy gets the hammer dropped on him for not putting out?  Can he sue his ex-wife for damages over all the money of his she spent during their marriage?

I’d like to see someone try suing a girl for not putting out after paying for a nice date.  Isn’t there an implicit non-verbal contract there somewhere?

Remind me never to get married in France.