So you want to know how to keep a girl involved in your set? LOCK HER IN! How do you do this? Check out how OGFurious does it…
(WARNING: Don’t ever actually do this. Ever.)
Here are some interesting, seduction-related stories from around the web.
- 9 Awesome Places To Have Sex
- Threesome Operator’s Manual
- Worst Places To Have Sex
- 11 Lies Women Tell Men
- Crazy Woman Calls Boyfriend 65,000 times
- 5 Things That Shouldn’t Happen In The Bedroom
- 7 Kama Sutra Sex Tips That Will Put You In The Hospital
- 50 Mistakes Women Make When Having Sex
- Red Heads Rejected From Sperm Banks
- Sex By The Numbers
You’ve just been BOMBED.
Pornstar Shawna Lenee offers some advice on how to get your lady off. Check it out… Read more
Here’s a video where the rules of Rugby are simply explained… and gives you a boner at the same time.
As usual, science shows up to kick some knowledge into your face!
Men who cheat on their spouses have always enjoyed an expedient explanation: Evolution made me do it. Many articles (here is one, and here is another), especially in recent years, have explored the theory that men sleep around because evolution has programmed them to seek fertile (and, conveniently, younger) wombs.
But what about women? If it’s really true that evolution can cause a man to risk his marriage, what effect does that have on women’s sexuality?
A new journal article suggests that evolutionary forces also push women to be more sexual, although in unexpected ways. University of Texas psychologist David Buss wrote the article, which appears in the July issue of Personality and Individual Differences, with the help of three graduate students, Judith Easton (who is listed as lead author), Jaime Confer and Cari Goetz. Buss, Easton and their colleagues found that women in their 30s and early 40s are significantly more sexual than younger women. Women ages 27 through 45 report not only having more sexual fantasies (and more intense sexual fantasies) than women ages 18 through 26 but also having more sex, period. And they are more willing than younger women to have casual sex, even one-night stands. In other words, despite the girls-gone-wild image of promiscuous college women, it is women in their middle years who are America’s most sexually industrious. (See the top 10 political sex scandals.)
By contrast, men’s sexual interest and output, usually measured by a reported number of orgasms per week, peaks in the teen years and then settles to a steady level (an average of three orgasms per week) for most of their lives. As I pointed out in March, most men remain sexually active into their 70s. According to the new study, as well as the study I wrote about in March, women’s sexual ardor declines precipitously after menopause.
Why would women be more sexually active in their middle years than in their teens and 20s? Buss and his students say evolution has encouraged women to be more sexually active as their fertility begins to decline and as menopause approaches.
Here’s how their theory works:
Our female ancestors grew accustomed to watching many of their children — perhaps as many as half — die of various diseases, starvation, warfare and so on before being able to have kids of their own. This trauma left a psychological imprint to bear as many children as possible. Becoming pregnant is much easier for women and girls in their teens and early 20s — so much easier that they need not spend much time having sex. (See photos of the history of the cougar.)
However, after the mid-20s, the lizard-brain impulse to have more kids faces a stark reality: it’s harder and harder to get pregnant as a woman’s remaining eggs age. And so women in their middle years respond by seeking more and more sex.
To test this theory, Buss and his students asked 827 women to complete questionnaires about their sexual habits. And, indeed, they found that women who had passed their peak fertility years but not quite reached menopause were the most sexually active. This age group — 27 through 45 — reported having significantly more sex than the two other age groups in the study, 18 through 26 and 46 and up. Women in their middle years were also more likely than the younger women to fantasize about someone other than their current partner. The new findings are consistent with those of an earlier Buss paper, from 2002, which found that women in their early 30s feel more lustful and report less abstinence than women in other age groups. In both studies, these findings held true for both partnered and single women, meaning that married women in their 30s and early 40s tend to have more sex than married women in their early 20s; ditto for single women. Also, whether the women were mothers didn’t matter. Only age had a strong affect on women’s reported sexual interest and behavior. (Read about cougar cruises.)
And yet there are a few flaws with the data in the new paper. Chiefly: some three-quarters of the participants in the study were recruited on Craigslist, a website where many go to seek hookups, meaning there was a self-selection problem with the sample. (The other participants were students at the University of Texas in Austin.) The authors also note that there are some alternative explanations for why women in their 30s and early 40s might be more sexual. Many of them may simply be more comfortable with sex than women in their teens and early 20s. Still, that raises the question of why they are more comfortable: perhaps evolution programmed that comfort.
Buss is the author of The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating, now in its fourth edition, and has become associated with evolutionary explanations for sexual behavior. His theories help explain why men can be cads — and why women can be cougars.
I thought this was pretty interesting, especially the part about how evolution has prepared women to bare children in their younger and most fertile years, and as they get older and it becomes more difficult to have children, they seek out more sexual pleasure.
That’s not to say younger women don’t get horny and want sex. Cause obviously, they do. And the whole “cougar” phenomena has to do with older women aggressively going after younger men. According to this study, women in the age range of 27-45 are the most sexually active, but its unclear who they’re sexually active WITH. They can’t all be going for younger guys, can they?
But that is a pretty interesting find. The next time you do an online dating search, set the age range to 27-45 and see what you get. I guess your chances of getting lucky with that age range is much higher!
Here’s a nifty little ditty that gives you some advice on how to date girls who make a living off of being ridiculously hawt.
Of course, this advice is pretty basic and general and can relate to any woman, not just models. But sometimes its good to hear it anyway.
Check out this sweet discount Brad P is offering…
It’s Drew, Program Manager at BradP.com
First off, thanks to the UDS Coaches for helping me put together an awesome $995 1-on-1 training deals last month for students! No better way to end the summer by meeting and picking up the hottest girls with some of the best pickup coaches in the world!
Since Brad was not included in last month’s offer, I decided it was only fair to offer a SPECIAL ONE-WEEK-ONLY deal for Brad’s upcoming workshop in Los Angeles on October 14th through 16th.
Normally, this workshop is $3490 for all 3 days.
If you register for this workshop within the next 7 days, you will receive $1000 OFF the original price!
That’s $2490 for ALL 3 days!
Less than the usual price of $2995 for 2 days!
Brad has only been teaching 1 to 2 workshops a year since he’s busy working with students 1-on-1, teaching at the Pickup Mansion (www.pickupmansion.com) and coaching our amazing students in the 30/30 Club (http://bradp.com/30-30-club/).
Many students want to meet & train directly with Brad. Some students even fly in from all over the world just to learn from Brad!
So just for the next 7 days ONLY, you can sign up for ALL 3 days of Brad’s LA workshop for just $2490!
After 7 days, all prices will go back to their normal rates.
Again, the Los Angeles workshop will be on October 14th through 16th!
Be sure to mention the following promotion code when contacting me:
Brad P gives excellent workshop. I’d highly recommend anyone taking this opportunity to check it out for yourself.
Hit’s Wednesday, so it’s time for some humpin’! This week, I bring you – drunk chicks making out with each other! Enjoy…
Okay, we’ve all heard the old line about banging fat chicks. You know, the one about rolling them in flour and finding the wet spot?
There ya go.
Marni from WingWomen has a video up on how to properly finger a girl. Even if her techniques don’t work for all girls, at the very least, you’ll learn how to finger Marni. lol.
The title pretty much says it all. Enjoy!
Yeah, there are lots of ways to get a girl. But this video breaks it down to its basics nicely. lol.
And by all men, I’m speaking mostly for myself, and assuming no other man out there is dumb enough to like what I clearly don’t. But frankly, there are some things girls adorn themselves with that I just absolutely HATE. I’m talking like Hitler hates the Jews. As in, if I could murder these fashions, I’d have no problem sleeping at night. Seriously, that’s how much I hate these horrible fashions that some women insist on subjecting me to.
Shitty Fashion Style #1: Facial Piercings
I can understand ear piercings. But when girls start shoving metal into their faces, I start to get graphic flashbacks of reading National Geographic when I was in grade school. Sure, some guys don’t mind facial piercings, but it NEVER makes a girl look better. In fact, if I see a pretty girl with a facial piercing, she instantly drops to an “average” girl in my book. FYI ladies, studs in your cheek, nose, or chin make you look like you have a huge metal zit or something. And eyebrow rings and lip rings – what’s the point? They just get in the way! Not only that, but anyone ever notice that facial piercings are constantly surrounded by red, irritated skin? It looks horrible. Stop it. Read more
This was just too funny, I had to share it with y’all. Some girl back in 2007 put up a post on Craigslist asking why she couldn’t find a decent guy to support her in New York. Some genius random poster wrote the perfect response to dealing with any golddigger. Check it out.
9/25/07 THIS APPEARED ON CRAIG’S LIST in New York
Okay, I’m tired of beating around the bush. I’m a beautiful (spectacularly beautiful) 25 year old girl. I’m articulate and classy.
I’m not from New York. I’m looking to get married to a guy who makes at least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind that a million a year is middle class in New York City, so I don’t think I’m overreaching at all.
Are there any guys who make 500K or more on this board? Any wives? Could you send me some tips? I dated a business man who makes average around 200 – 250. But that’s where I seem to hit a roadblock. 250,000 won’t get me to central park west. I know a woman in my yoga class who was married to an investment banker and lives in Tribeca, and she’s not as pretty as I am, nor is she a great genius. So what is she doing right? How do I get to her level?
Here are my questions specifically:
- Where do you single rich men hang out? Give me specifics- bars, restaurants, gyms
-What are you looking for in a mate? Be honest guys, you won’t hurt my feelings
-Is there an age range I should be targeting (I’m 25)?
- Why are some of the women living lavish lifestyles on the upper east side so plain? I’ve seen really ‘plain jane’ boring types who have nothing to offer married to incredibly wealthy guys. I’ve seen drop dead gorgeous girls in singles bars in the east village. What’s the story there?
- Jobs I should look out for? Everyone knows – lawyer, investment banker, doctor. How much do those guys really make? And where do they hang out? Where do the hedge fund guys hang out?
- How you decide marriage vs. just a girlfriend? I am looking for MARRIAGE ONLY
Please hold your insults – I’m putting myself out there in an honest way. Most beautiful women are superficial; at least I’m being up front about it. I wouldn’t be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn’t able to match them – in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a nice home and hearth.
That was the question from the aforementioned Gold-digger. Now here’s the response. (WARNING: Prepare for awesomeness!) Read more