Ross Jeffries Vs. Tom Lykis
July 22, 2008 by Thundercat
Filed under Rants & Reviews
Its no big surprise that MINE’99 likes to attack people who are better than him (which is pretty much just about everybody in the scene). And in one of his latest blog posts, he targets Tom Lykis, popular radio personality and "Hollywood Ladies Man."
Check out this rant Ross spewed…
Ross Jeffries writes:
Dear Speed Seduction(R) Student,One of the questions I’m sometimes asked is, “What do you think of Tom Leykis and Leykis 101?”
For those of you who don’t know, Leykis has an enormously popular syndicated radio talk show(he’s on 97.1 FM here in Southern California) where he mostly preaches his misogynist doctrine on success with women, called Leykis 101.
While Leykis talks about the importance of having game, which is certainly important, it his definition of what game is that is troublesome and twisted.
Essentially Leykis believes that women are attracted mostly to men with money, and that women have sex not because they mostly enjoy it, but to latch on to a man and use him as a meal ticket. And he further believes that by treating women like trash, they will feel the need to validate themselves by sleeping with the men who treat them in this fashion.
For him, game is therefore about lying to women about your social-economic status to make yourself more appealing and treating women like doo doo.
What isn’t stated in all of this is what I actually find most troubling; that sex is basically about dumping your load on or into someone who visually excites you but emotionally repels you. It’s about stimulation and discharge and nothing more; a sort of very vivid and interactive jack-off.
Isn’t it interesting? His view of women and how they should be treated, matches up and reflects his experience of sex. If you hold people as contemptible then how could you view joining with them intimately as something other than contemptible at worst, or merely mechanical build up and release at best?
And beyond that, his ideas are inaccurate to be generous about it. The biggest inaccuracy that women don’t enjoy and crave sex for its own sake, and that pretending to be able to buy them is the best way to go about things.
Very sad for Tom and for those listeners he badly misleads. For those of us who know how to capture and lead womens’ imagination and emotions, we know how utterly unnecessary the contempt and the lying is, and how grateful women are to be lead to the kinds of wonderful feelings they deeply crave.
Dump the hate, Tom. And open up your mind.
Peace and piece,
RJ
P.S. If you are a Leykis listener I especially invite your comments.
Well, Ross, you’re in luck, because I AM a Lykis listener, and I’ve got some comments…
First of all – I love how MINE’99 berates Tom for hating women, when its obvious to anyone with a brain that Ross has more hate and bitterness towards women than any man since Ted Bundy. (The only difference here is that women tended to LIKE Ted Bundy before he went all psycho killer on them.) Need I remind the world that Ross is the guy who proudly taught people how to regress a woman back to childhood and fuck with her sexual identity so you can have sex with them? How women are nothing but objects to be turned into "sex slaves" through hypnosis?
Anyone who was in the early days of SS knows how bitter Ross is towards women. This is also a guy who joked about hypnotizing his brother’s wife into giving him a blowjob.
To me, its obvious that Ross misses the boat when it comes to what Tom Lykis teaches. Tom’s show is really about how men need to take power back from a feminist, anti-male, society. He sees how men are degraded and robbed of their power in this world, and his aim is to EDUCATE men on how to keep their power, especially with women.
Let me tell you – if ANY GUY out there has a problem with supplication, it’ll be cured by listening to Tom Lykis. Sure, sometimes he goes too far and can sound very bitter about women. But for the most part, he speaks the truth.
Tom’s philosophy can really be divided into two parts – one is the technique, which is all about "getting laid for less money." The other is the philosophy, which is about having self respect, retaining your power, and keeping society from cutting off your balls.
The technique part of his Lykis 101 framework is pretty cut and dry. It’s about getting laid – FAST. Its no more evil than most of the club game that’s taught in the community. But Tom realizes that until a woman "gives it up" she has the power in the relationship. Tom believes that in order for a relationship to work, the guy has to be the leader, and the woman has to be submissive to the guy. And you know what? He’s right!
That’s not to say you treat the woman like shit, and that there isn’t any give-and-take. But its the MAN who has to be strong and stand his ground, and get what HE wants. And when guys do this, both the guy AND girl are happier.
When Tom Lykis talks about sex, he talks about it to counter the argument that "all men want is sex." He gets women calling into the shows all the time complaining about cheating boyfriends and whatnot. His point is that women don’t undertand a man’s need for sex. For us, ejaculation is as necessary as going to the bathroom. Tom’s philosophy is that if women aren’t pleasing their men, their men will look for it elsewhere because that physical need to ejaculate is so strong. Ross tries to paint it as though Tom has this shallow view of sex, when in reality, he’s trying to educate women on men’s physical urges.
I’ve gottent to meet Tom Lykis before (along with his VERY attractive Venezuelan girlfriend) and he’s not only a cool guy, but one smart motherfucker. Smarter than Ross, that’s for sure.
Tom has been married 6 times. To my knowledge, Ross has never been married. Tom has banged hundreds of women. To my knowledge, I don’t know of any women Ross has banged. (That’s not to say there aren’t any, I just don’t know of any) Tom gets hot girls, and Ross, well, doesn’t. Tom is rich. Ross isn’t.
Now I ask you – based on that information, who would you rather learn from?
Just more proof that MINE’99 is a moron.
vipryamitel dyson kypit_qeOl on 
vipryamitel dyson kypit_wdOl on 
vipryamitel dyson kypit_xbOl on 
vipryamitel dyson kypit_hqOl on 
DanteLougs on 
click here for more https://latch.icu/
more https://lagoon.wtf
ссылка на сайт https://weekpay.ru
https://t.me/s/Official_1xbet_1xbet/972
проверить сайт [url=https://1cars.by]аренда авто минск на выходные[/url]
It’s no secret how President Donald Trump feels about sports teams turning away from Native American mascots. He’s repeatedly called for the return of the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians, claiming their recent rebrands were part of a “woke” agenda designed to erase history.
But one surprising team has really gotten the president’s attention: the Massapequa Chiefs.
The Long Island school district has refused to change its logo and name under a mandate from New York state banning schools from using team mascots appropriating Indigenous culture. Schools were given two years to rebrand, but Massapequa is the lone holdout, having missed the June 30 deadline to debut a new logo.
[url=https://kra-39--cc.ru]kraken38[/url]
The district lost an initial lawsuit it filed against the state but now has the federal government on its side. In May, Trump’s Department of Education intervened on the district’s behalf, claiming the state’s mascot ban is itself discriminatory.
Massapequa’s Chiefs logo — an American Indian wearing a yellow feathered headdress — is expected to still be prominently displayed when the fall sports season kicks off soon, putting the quiet Long Island hamlet at the center of a political firestorm.
[url=https://kra-39--cc.ru]kra31 at[/url]
The district is now a key “battleground,” said Oliver Roberts, a Massapequa alum and the lawyer representing the school board in its fresh lawsuit against New York claiming that the ban is unconstitutional and discriminatory.
The Trump administration claims New York’s mascot ban violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits recipients of federal funds from engaging in discriminatory behavior based on race, color or national origin — teeing up a potentially precedent-setting fight.
The intervention on behalf of Massapequa follows a pattern for a White House that has aggressively applied civil rights protections to police “reverse discrimination” and coerced schools and universities into policy concessions by withholding federal funds.
“Our goal is to assist nationally,” Roberts said. “It’s us putting forward our time and effort to try and assist with this national movement and push back against the woke bureaucrats trying to cancel our country’s history and tradition.”
kra35 cc
https://kra39—cc.ru
в этом разделе [url=https://miningclub.live/]antminer s21 hydro[/url]
additional info https://vapeheart.shop/
https://t.me/s/Official_1xbet_1xbet/1456
https://t.me/s/Official_1xbet_1xbet/1315
https://t.me/s/Official_1xbet_1xbet/348
пояснения[url=https://hyip-helper.net]купить хайп[/url]
веб-сайт[url=https://hyip-helper.net]hyip под ключ[/url]
выберите ресурсы
[url=https://hyip-helper.net/]хайп проект[/url]
What we’re covering
• Zelensky in Washington: European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, as he meets with US President Donald Trump this afternoon. Trump said Zelensky must agree to some of Russia’s conditions — including that Ukraine cede Crimea and agree never to join NATO — for the war to end.
[url=https://kra36.com]kra37 СЃСЃ[/url]
• Potential security guarantees: At last week’s summit with Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to allow security guarantees for Ukraine and made concessions on “land swaps” as part of a potential peace deal, US envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN. Zelensky suggested that such guarantees would need to be stronger than those that “didn’t work” in the past. Russia has yet to mention such agreements.
[url=https://kra-35-at.com]kra40[/url]
• On the ground: Zelensky condemned Russia’s latest strikes across Ukraine, which killed at least 10 people, saying the Kremlin intends to “humiliate diplomatic efforts” and underscores “why reliable security guarantees are required.”
kra40 СЃСЃ
https://kra35cc.com
взгляните на сайте здесь[url=https://hyip-helper.net]купить hyip проект[/url]
https://t.me/s/Official_1xbet_1xbet/1283
He has had more cordial, more productive, meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28.
[url=https://kraken2trfqodidvlh4aa337cpzfrhdlfldhve5.com]kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33ad[/url]
But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier.
[url=https://kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo3ad.com]kraken4qzqnoi7ogpzpzwrxk7mw53n5i56loydwiyonu4owxsh4g67yd.onion[/url]
Increasingly, it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees.
The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone, says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up, says Putin, apparently with Trump’s blessing.
But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas, like credibility, come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise, to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement?
Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West, by testing any such guarantees, confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future.
For now, it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize, and say no.
If he chose the latter, would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine, in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing, for instance?
If that happened, to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat?
It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him.
kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd onion
https://kraken2trfqodidvlh4aa337cpzfrhdlfldhve5.com
What we’re covering
• Zelensky in Washington: European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, as he meets with US President Donald Trump this afternoon. Trump said Zelensky must agree to some of Russia’s conditions — including that Ukraine cede Crimea and agree never to join NATO — for the war to end.
[url=https://kra36.com]kra31 СЃСЃ[/url]
• Potential security guarantees: At last week’s summit with Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to allow security guarantees for Ukraine and made concessions on “land swaps” as part of a potential peace deal, US envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN. Zelensky suggested that such guarantees would need to be stronger than those that “didn’t work” in the past. Russia has yet to mention such agreements.
[url=https://kra38at.com]kra36[/url]
• On the ground: Zelensky condemned Russia’s latest strikes across Ukraine, which killed at least 10 people, saying the Kremlin intends to “humiliate diplomatic efforts” and underscores “why reliable security guarantees are required.”
kra34
https://kra34.org
читать
[url=https://hyip-helper.net/]купить hyip проект[/url]
He has had more cordial, more productive, meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28.
[url=https://kraken2trfqodidvlh4aa337cpzfrhdlfldhve5nf7njhumwr7inst.com]kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33ad.onion[/url]
But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier.
[url=https://kraken2trfqodidvlh4a337cpzfrhdlfldhve5nf7njhumwr7instad.com]kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd.onion[/url]
Increasingly, it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees.
The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone, says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up, says Putin, apparently with Trump’s blessing.
But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas, like credibility, come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise, to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement?
Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West, by testing any such guarantees, confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future.
For now, it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize, and say no.
If he chose the latter, would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine, in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing, for instance?
If that happened, to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat?
It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him.
kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd onion
https://kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33adonion.net
He has had more cordial, more productive, meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28.
[url=https://kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33adonion.net]kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgyd onion[/url]
But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier.
[url=https://kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33adonion.net]kraken2trfqodidvlh4aa337cpzfrhdlfldhve5nf7njhumwr7instad.onion[/url]
Increasingly, it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees.
The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone, says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up, says Putin, apparently with Trump’s blessing.
But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas, like credibility, come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise, to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement?
Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West, by testing any such guarantees, confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future.
For now, it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize, and say no.
If he chose the latter, would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine, in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing, for instance?
If that happened, to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat?
It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him.
kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd
https://kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33ad.shop
He has had more cordial, more productive, meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28.
[url=https://kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33ad.org]kraken2trfqodidvlh4aa337cpzfrhdlfldhve5nf7njhumwr7instad.onion[/url]
But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier.
[url=https://kraken2trfqodidvlh4a37cpzfrhdlfldhve5nf7njhumwr7instad.com]kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd[/url]
Increasingly, it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees.
The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone, says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up, says Putin, apparently with Trump’s blessing.
But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas, like credibility, come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise, to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement?
Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West, by testing any such guarantees, confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future.
For now, it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize, and say no.
If he chose the latter, would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine, in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing, for instance?
If that happened, to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat?
It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him.
kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgyd onion
https://kraken2trfqodidvlh4aa337cpzfrhdlfldhve5.com
выберите ресурсы
[url=https://bs2site2.net/]ссылка на сайт блэкспрут[/url]
каталог
[url=https://bs2beast2.at/]bs2tsite3.io[/url]
see this page https://pharmfriend.net/deu/erox-plus/
пояснения
[url=https://bs2site2.net]рабочее зеркало blacksprut[/url]
перенаправляется сюда
[url=https://bs02site2.at]блекспрут официальный сайт[/url]
узнать больше
[url=https://bs2beast2.at/]блекспрут сайт[/url]
страница [url=https://bs2beast2.at]blacksprut вход ссылка[/url]
узнать больше https://progearph.org/grc/hemorrhoids/hemorexal/
сайт
[url=https://bs2beast2.at/]блэкспрут тор[/url]
другие
[url=https://bs2saite.gl/]даркнет маркетплейс[/url]
While many visitors come to the area for the otherworldly landscapes of Badlands National Park, roughly 60 miles east of the city, or the wildlife viewing at Custer State Park to the south, the city offers its own unique scenery.
Rapid City borders the Black Hills to the west and prairie grasslands to the east. Rapid Creek meanders through town and an adjacent greenway connects much of the city’s 1,650 acres of park land.
[url=https://tripskan40.cc]трипскан[/url]
Two beloved decades-old parks — Dinosaur Park and Storybook Island — have recently been upgraded to be disability accessible. Wheelchair-friendly Dinosaur Park includes seven life-size dinosaur statues and panoramic city views. At Storybook Island, six pieces of playground equipment are wheelchair accessible and have Braille panels and sensory panels for children with autism. The park is renowned for fairy tale character playsets, an antique carousel and a miniature train. Admission to both parks is free.
https://tripskan40.cc
tripscan войти
Mountain bikers and hikers favor the panoramic views from trails within the 150-acre Skyline Wilderness Area, or from spots along the more than 20 miles of trails in Hanson-Larsen Memorial Park, where M Hill pays tribute to science and engineering university South Dakota Mines. All of these trails are located within city limits.
Jason Kingsbury is a tourist-turned-resident who relocated largely because of the city’s outdoor recreation. Kingsbury is an avid camper, mountain biker and fly fisherman.
“I was absolutely blown away with how much there is to do in Rapid City,” Kingsbury said. Accessing outstanding outdoor recreation in just minutes is unique, he said.
“A lot of people do not have that experience. They can go to Memorial Park and ride world-class (trails). They can ride there from their hotel — that really impresses people,” Kingsbury said.
“What a lot of people always say is ‘I can’t believe how cool this is. I never thought South Dakota had things like this,’” he said. “They realize real quickly we’re far more than just Mount Rushmore.”
see https://saleshophealth.com/ltu/joints/product-osteomed-ultra/
view it now https://zdravsklad.space/czech/sensual-shape-gel/
the original source https://zdravsklad.space/italy/valgufix/
Источник
[url=https://bs02site2.at]блекспрут даркнет[/url]
Рекомендую отличный ресурс для поиска полезной информации на любые темы!
Особенно интересна статья: 10 стоматологических клиник Минска
На сайте есть удобные калькуляторы, сервисы и актуальные новости. Присоединяйтесь к сообществу активных пользователей!
content https://nutramed.health/estonia/joints/artodip-gel-natural-gel-for-joints/
Рекомендую отличный ресурс для поиска полезной информации на любые темы!
Особенно интересна статья: Как управлять проектами в консалтинге
На сайте есть удобные калькуляторы, сервисы и актуальные новости. Присоединяйтесь к сообществу активных пользователей!
Since India’s independence from Britain in 1947, the status of English in India has been deeply political – entwined with questions of identity, power, and national direction.
Today, English is one of several official languages in India, spoken by about 10% of the population. Hindi is the first language for around 44% of citizens, according to the 2011 census.
[url=https://trip-scan.biz]трипскан [/url]
But in recent years, Modi’s BJP has placed particular emphasis on promoting Hindi and reducing the use of English in public life.
The prime minister almost never delivers speeches in English, preferring Hindi for national addresses such as his monthly radio program. His administration has encouraged officials to use Hindi on social media and in government correspondence – though, after criticism from non-Hindi-speaking states, clarified that this was intended mainly for the Hindi belt in the north.
https://trip-scan.biz
трип скан
When India hosted world leaders for the 2023 G20 summit in New Delhi, invitations were sent out from “Bharat” – the Sanskrit or Hindi name for the country – instead of “India,” fueling speculation that the government aims to ultimately phase out the country’s English designation altogether.
Modi’s critics have been quick to note his political motives behind these moves.
With its roots in the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), a right-wing organization that advocates Hindu hegemony within India, the BJP’s language policies resonate with many in a country where nearly 80% of people are Hindu.
Analysts say the BJP is seeking to capitalize on this demographic by promoting language policies that strengthen its support base in the north.
According to Rita Kothari, an English professor from Ashoka University, the government “is certainly interested in homogenizing the country and making Hindi more widespread.”
But that policy can also backfire – in part because many regions, such as Marathi-speaking Maharashtra in the west – are staunchly proud of their local language.
The violent clashes in the state’s megacity Mumbai earlier this month were sparked by the regional government’s controversial decision to make Hindi a compulsory third language in public primary schools.
Pushback and protest has also been especially strong in the south, where English and regional languages such as Tamil, Telugu, and Kannada are valued as symbols of local identity and autonomy.
перейти на сайт https://kral38.cc/
взгляните на сайте здесь https://kra38l.at
Главная https://kra38l.at/
посетить веб-сайт https://kra38l.at/
Продолжение https://kra38at.at
узнать https://kra-37at.at/
читать https://kra-37at.at/
While many visitors come to the area for the otherworldly landscapes of Badlands National Park, roughly 60 miles east of the city, or the wildlife viewing at Custer State Park to the south, the city offers its own unique scenery.
Rapid City borders the Black Hills to the west and prairie grasslands to the east. Rapid Creek meanders through town and an adjacent greenway connects much of the city’s 1,650 acres of park land.
[url=https://tripskan40.cc]tripskan[/url]
Two beloved decades-old parks — Dinosaur Park and Storybook Island — have recently been upgraded to be disability accessible. Wheelchair-friendly Dinosaur Park includes seven life-size dinosaur statues and panoramic city views. At Storybook Island, six pieces of playground equipment are wheelchair accessible and have Braille panels and sensory panels for children with autism. The park is renowned for fairy tale character playsets, an antique carousel and a miniature train. Admission to both parks is free.
https://tripskan40.cc
трипскан сайт
Mountain bikers and hikers favor the panoramic views from trails within the 150-acre Skyline Wilderness Area, or from spots along the more than 20 miles of trails in Hanson-Larsen Memorial Park, where M Hill pays tribute to science and engineering university South Dakota Mines. All of these trails are located within city limits.
Jason Kingsbury is a tourist-turned-resident who relocated largely because of the city’s outdoor recreation. Kingsbury is an avid camper, mountain biker and fly fisherman.
“I was absolutely blown away with how much there is to do in Rapid City,” Kingsbury said. Accessing outstanding outdoor recreation in just minutes is unique, he said.
“A lot of people do not have that experience. They can go to Memorial Park and ride world-class (trails). They can ride there from their hotel — that really impresses people,” Kingsbury said.
“What a lot of people always say is ‘I can’t believe how cool this is. I never thought South Dakota had things like this,’” he said. “They realize real quickly we’re far more than just Mount Rushmore.”