Buy Zanaflex Without Prescription

September 22, 2008 by  
Filed under Drama & Rumors

Buy zanaflex without prescription, So if you're a follower of the blog, you'll know that I've been critical of Stephane over at Ideagasms since, oh, it began.  I've just had ay too many people I like and trust tell me about how the guy lied and screwed them over to actually believe Stephane is in this business to actually help other people as opposed to creating a cult for himself.

In one of my early podcasts, you can see where I expose most of his lies during an interview with Barry Kirkey.  (Its not one of my better podcasts, but whatever.  The point is to get the truth out there.)

Anyway, today I get an email from a reader named Lor who informs me of some major drama going on over at Ideagasms.  It seems more and more of the cult has stopped drinking the kool-aid, and Stephane is banning them to keep them from speaking out against his teachings.

But these "Ex-IGs" aren't staying quiet.  In fact, they've created their own forum and Facebook Group to expose the truth about Stephane, and boy, is it not pretty. Zanaflex canada, Check out what David B., the creator of the Facebook Group, has to say about his experiences with Stephane...

David B. writes:
Ideagasms Exposed, buy zanaflex without prescription.
An Insider’s Story of the Journey Through Stephane Land

This is an honest account of my experience with the organization known as Ideagasms, and its leader, Stephane Hemon. This could be classified as an “expose” of sorts, since it contains a lot of information that’s less than flattering. However, my intention is not to harm or demean anyone, fda approved zanaflex, but simply to speak about something that needs to be spoken of. People have a right to be informed. Buy zanaflex without prescription, This post is also for Ideagasms members who have been wondering where the “ex-IG” forum is since they’ve heard rumors about it, but have been unable to find it because of Stephane’s prohibition of our links.

To the moderators here: I completely understand and respect the goals of this forum (success with women), as well as your right to moderate it how you wish in order to facilitate those goals. Please understand that part of success is about avoiding pitfalls, and I’m posting this to inform people about one of those. Please let this message stay up. By allowing it to reach people, you may be helping to steer them away from a very dark, Order zanaflex in canada, lonely, and frustrating road.

Ok, so here’s my story, buy zanaflex without prescription.

When I first discovered Ideagasms, it was in its infancy. Steph was just an average dude with some modest insight into the pickup world, trying to make a living out of it. His ideas concerning spiritual topics and how they relate to pickup intrigued me, so I read all his newsletters, and signed up on his forum as soon as he started it. I soon became the most prolific poster, earning a wide degree of admiration from the other members through my lengthy and entertaining field reports, buy zanaflex internet. Buy zanaflex without prescription, Within just a couple months, Steph made me the admin of the forum.

I felt that he was honest in the beginning, and genuinely trying to help people. He didn’t make himself out to be anything special, beyond a regular guy with some skills to teach. But as with so many things, what starts out as a good intention can quickly become obscured when power is involved.

After a few months, he started to change the structure of his posts and newsletters, taking out what genuine insight he had, Zanaflex alternative, and replacing it with boasts about his accomplishments. He started talking more and more about how good his game is, and started using labels such as “best PUA in the world” to describe himself, buy zanaflex without prescription. Perhaps it was due to our youthful naivete, or our eagerness to believe someone had finally found all the answers; but for whatever the reason, I and many others bought into it, and heaped praise on him. Thus began a cycle of him boasting outlandish (and as we would later find out, extremely exaggerated) claims about his skills, and forum members blindly worshipping him for it – a pattern that would only intensify as time went on.

At this time (around the beginning of 2006), he began to delve headfirst into some really freaky “New Age” stuff that would make even a messianic cult leader blush. Now I happen to enjoy a lot of new agey concepts, generic zanaflex, I’m no atheist – but he took it to such an extreme that I’m almost surprised to still be alive. Buy zanaflex without prescription, He claimed he was going to achieve something called “Ascension” – a state in which a person evolves to the point that they have no more issues in life, no more karma, and their soul walks out of their body and gains the ability to manifest any physical object they desire (e.g. gold, food, women, a new body), fly to other galaxies and back, and live the rest of their life in a constant state of orgasm. He claimed he was going to do it by the end of 2008, and that if we followed him, Buy zanaflex us, we would be able to do so as well. Most of us would go in 2012, but a special few of his closest, most devoted students, might be able to make it by his side in 2008. To grant credibility to these claims, he cited the guidance of a reclusive, enigmatic “aunt”, who was supposedly one of the top 10 or 20 spiritual people in the whole world. She never communicated to anyone except through him, yet that didn’t stop her from giving us remote “past life readings” for $30 a pop – readings which were rife with duplications, historical inaccuracies, and contradictions, buy zanaflex without prescription. In the spring of that year, he stopped talking about her, cheapest zanaflex, and largely quieted down on the Ascension talk too- and it wasn’t until I asked him on the phone, “whatever happened to that aunt of yours?”, that he brushed it off by saying she went insane and disappeared. And that was the end of that.

Before I go on, I want to explain one of Stephane’s core psychological tactics that he uses for making people follow him. It’s called “cognitive dissonance.”. Buy zanaflex without prescription, Basically, how it works, is he will come out with a new concept – something ridiculous, like tricking a guy into swallowing your cum is a compassionate thing to do (see his “Dragonbutter” story) – and he’ll suffix it with a seemingly innocuous, yet very potent sentence right afterwards:

“Many people won’t be ready to handle this truth.”
“You will only agree with this if your heart is open.”
“Only those with high self-esteem will understand what I mean.”

This flies right under the radar, and gets you to think of yourself as “un-evolved” (read: “not as cool”) compared to your peers, who all supposedly have high enough vibrations to agree with him – unless you can manage to somehow buy into his story as well. So with the self-image under threat, the mind will do whatever it needs to in order to protect itself, Order zanaflex cheap online, including altering its belief systems (i.e. Dragonbutter is not cruel, it’s lovely!) to conform with the group, and earn the label “open-hearted” or whatever other label is in question. In this fashion, entire belief systems can be surreptitiously torn down, piece by piece, and replaced with new belief systems, without the believer even realizing what’s happened. If you’re not aware of how this works, it’s only a matter of time before you become ensnared in it – and once in it, buy zanaflex online, it just keeps gathering momentum, because more and more of your self-image is staked on your position in the group. I fell for this big time, buy zanaflex without prescription.

Anyway, back to the story. In June 2006, I visited Montreal, in order to meet the man himself. I ended up staying there the whole summer, in order to learn from him (and besides, Zanaflex side effects, Montreal is an awesome city), and it was during this time that I first started to notice that not all was well in Steph-land.

I went out with him 3 or 4 times a week, and began to notice some “inconsistencies” in his claims, to put it mildly. Buy zanaflex without prescription, We would be out at a bar, and Ghita would befriend a couple of girls and bring them to our table, introducing them to Steph. Then they would continue to talk to Ghita, while Steph sipped his beer and chatted with the guys. They might have given him an occasional sidelong glance or nod of acknowledgment, but overall they paid little attention to him, or any of us. But then in the field report the next day, cost of zanaflex, it would be quite different, with Steph claiming “all 4 girls were hardcore into me, shaking and quivering from my presence, dripping wet from the sound of my voice, my game is #1 in the world, im the best PUA in the world, no one else has my skills, no one can do what I do, I’m the best, Zanaflex us, I’m the greatest, blah blah blah.”

There were times when he’d play pool at the bar. Occasionally he’d make a difficult shot, and a few people standing nearby would clap. But in the field report, it became something like “half the BAR was cheering me on.” These types of exaggerations were not isolated instances – they were patterns, and they still are, as he continues them to this day, buy zanaflex without prescription.

And the most telling evidence of all, is the fact that I’ve never seen him approach a girl – ever. I asked him so many times to demonstrate his skills, just once, and he outright refused, claiming that he “paid his dues” by training Ghita to pick up for him, and therefore doesn’t have to do it himself anymore, zanaflex purchase. I have never seen him interact with a girl for more than 30 seconds, other than Ghita, despite hanging out with him for hundreds of hours in a city filled to the brim with beautiful women.

Here’s a funny story. Buy zanaflex without prescription, After a while, my requests must have gotten annoying to him, so he grudgingly agreed to demonstrate an approach. So he bade me to follow him through the bar until he found a chick to talk to. I stuck by him for about 20 minutes, until finally the normal course of events got us seperated. Then about a half an hour later, I heard a voice behind me – it was Steph. Buy zanaflex no prescription required, “Did you see. Did you see???, buy zanaflex without prescription. Whaaat. You weren’t looking??. I did an approach!. Fuck, you didn’t see?”

This happened more than once. Buy zanaflex without prescription, Eventually I gave in to the reality that I would never see Stephane Hemon talk to a girl. Only a few people I know of have seen him interact with girls at all, (nevermind approach, just interact), and not surprisingly, they report that he comes off creepy - alienating them within minutes, buy discount zanaflex online, if not seconds. He himself admits this to a degree, rationalizing it as the fault of the girls, saying they just couldn’t handle his high amount of “Light.”

At the same time, in my own life, his methods were causing my already shaky success with women to plummet into depths I never imagined possible. I don’t want to go into just how bad it was, but it was somewhere around “absolute zero”. And Steph helped me rationalize it by saying things like “don’t worry man, Buy cheapest zanaflex on line, these girls are just afraid of your Light. They can’t handle you, and that’s why they’re running away – they’re afraid, buy zanaflex without prescription. Just keep doing what you’re doing, and eventually you’ll find a girl whose heart is open enough to appreciate you.” So I kept going.

I wrote numerous field reports detailing my adventures in Montreal, praising Steph’s methods. From my reports, it would have seemed that I was doing really well, and success was juuuuuuuust around the corner. But inside, my doubts were growing. Buy zanaflex without prescription, I didn’t want to keep doing stuff that wasn’t working, but at the same time I didn’t want to risk rejection from the group if I challenged the leader or his doctrines. Ideagasms had become cultified, cheapest zanaflex prices, with some people getting banned for being overly vocal in their disagreements, or having too much praise for a rival teacher or method. As the admin of the forum, it was too much to risk, especially since I was the one doing the bannings. 

So that fall I went back to college for my last semester. During this time, I stopped praising Steph and started posting about my own theories and discoveries. I also started dropping hints about my dissatisfaction with the leader and his teachings, saying as much as I could without directly challenging him, buy zanaflex without prescription. Steph grew more distant, Buy zanaflex, and more reluctant to talk to me. In December I went right back up to Montreal, planning to live there permanently due to the merits of the city itself, more so than it’s status as the capital of Ideagasms. I had pretty much dropped out of the cult in all but name, and the desire began growing to speak out openly.

After a few nights out with the “gang” (Steph and his band of male groupies who follow him around, supplicating to him and giving him rockstar social proof that he uses to gain what little attention he can from girls), and seeing him do some really nasty things (such as sticking around a group of hapless Christian girls from Alabama for a whole night, ostracizing them for their beliefs and encouraging me and the gang to join him when they wanted nothing to do with any of us, as well as him laughing at homeless people, where to buy zanaflex, throwing a beer bottle down to try to shatter it on the bar floor, getting his Ascension-bound spiritual ass shitfaced six nights in a row, and other stuff I won’t get into), I had had enough. Buy zanaflex without prescription, Finally, I publicly questioned him on his forum. I asked him how he can keep telling me to use the same methods, if they obviously aren’t working. And he banned me just for that.

I didn’t know what to do, so I apologized, Buy no rx zanaflex, and he let me back on the forum. My drive towards honesty once again getting the better of me, I then wrote a post about how people are hero-worshipping him, and urging them to stop doing it. I was banned again, and he pretty much hasn’t talked to me since, buy zanaflex without prescription.

After that happened, a friend let me read the forum through his account, and I watched it degenerate further and further. He began cracking down more than ever on dissenters and those who started waking up. Whenever someone would poke their head above the clouds and ask him a serious question, or point out flaws in his doctrine in any way, he banned them immediately, zanaflex drug. Dozens of people were banned in a period of just a few months. Buy zanaflex without prescription, Then came one night, which we’re calling “the midnight massacre”, where he banned 12 people all at once, under the pretense of “raising the energy vibration of the forum.” So that’s when we decided that this guy has to be exposed. And we started our own forum.

Sadly, most of the people there are not going anywhere, and there is no way for them to realize it because the chorus of conformity is so loud and so insulated that there’s no way for any contrary idea to come in and interrupt it. As soon as someone realizes his methods don’t work, he bans them before they get a chance to tell others their thoughts. He has a team of 5 or 6 followers who scan the forum all day long, deleting and banning anything that resembles criticism in the slightest degree. People believe his claims of superpowers and of being “the most successful human being on the planet” (real quote), not because he’s particularly persuasive about it, but rather because he censors any voice that doesn’t agree with it, buy zanaflex without prescription. Find zanaflex on internet, In the last six months, he has been delving into the writings of an obscure, kooky “scientist” named David Hawkins, whose primary claim to fame is that he has discovered a bullet-proof system for determining “absolute truth”, which basically involves assigning a number (1 to 1000) to a particular person, thought, or idea, with 1 being the darkest, most untrue, and 1000 being absolute light and truth. It’s no surprise that he calibrates himself and Ghita in the 600’s and 700’s, cheap zanaflex in usa, his followers mostly in the 400’s and 500’s, non-followers in the 200’s and 300’s, and critics (such as us) in the 100’s. With this system, he categorically justifies anything he wants to.

Most of his posts now are simply about “reaching a higher numerical level”, and his forum has turned into a spiritual penis-size contest of aspiring calibraters, trying to claim the highest numerical value for themselves that they can get away with and have others believe. Buy zanaflex without prescription, To call it a keyboard jockey’s paradise would be an understatement. Relationships and sexuality are rarely discussed anymore, Zanaflex india, except for the purpose of justifying a higher calibration. Most field reports read like missionary diaries, detailing how the gospel was brought to the heathens. One structure that seems to be quite popular, is as follows (paraphrasing, of course):

“Hey guys. I went out in a state of 500, pitied all the low-vibing girls who were stuck in the 300’s, tried to help them ‘raise up their level’ but my help was denied, and so, despite having a girl who was ‘totally into me’, order cheap zanaflex online, I had to do the ‘integrous’ thing, and ‘disqualify’ her.”

Needless to say, it doesn’t work in actually improving their ability to relate to people, or women. On the contrary, they’re being taught to back themselves into corners, to burn bridges, and to reject more and more of the world, under the pretense that it’s all beneath them, buy zanaflex without prescription. It’s really just a defense mechanism to justify loneliness, to make it seem noble and desirable since they’re at a loss to overcome it - but no one is allowed to suggest this. In fact, one of Steph’s closest confidantes, his chief “Calibrater”, Tablet zanaflex, got banned just a few days ago for making this very observation.

I don’t doubt that most of them are very frustrated on the inside. I know what it’s like to be in pain, while wearing a mask on the outside that says things are wonderful and Ascension is right around the corner. Buy zanaflex without prescription, But he keeps on dangling the carrot for them, and they remain distracted.

“Hey, who cares, sex isn’t that good for you anyway, it’ll detract from your spiritual ascension process. Would you rather bounce up and down on a bed and trade body juices, or raise your consciousness to *700* and beyond. I just checked my calibration of you, buying zanaflex online, and you made a big jump recently. Only a few more weeks and you should be at 650. 700 isn’t far away!”

I wonder how long it can continue, buy zanaflex without prescription. I suppose each person has a limit to how much they can take, and once they pass it, they leave. But there are always more people waiting in the wings, and the cycle continues, just with new faces. We, Find cheap zanaflex online, his ex-students, want to put a stop to the cycle, but unfortunately there’s no way to reach through his tough curtain of censorship. That’s why we’re posting here – to maybe reach a few people. Buy zanaflex without prescription, The censorship itself is complete. He outright condemns the idea of free speech – openly. He says freedom of speech is just an excuse for people to say negative things and lower the vibration of the group. “Doubt”, he says, is a dark energy that reeks of ego. “Opinions” are worthless ego-creations, designed to plant “untruths” in people’s minds, buy generic zanaflex. When he bans people, he often reminds them that skepticism calibrates below 200, and the forum calibrates above 600, and the discrepancy means that they’re “sabotaging his mission.”

Fuckin crazy, if you ask me, buy zanaflex without prescription.

As for our forum, he bans anyone who even speaks about it. All you have to do is ask, “hey, I heard there’s an Ex-IG forum out there somewhere, does anyone have the link?”, and you’re kicked out. He even has moles on our forum, trying to discover which of the people there still have accounts on his forum, Zanaflex cheap, so he can ban them.

Not long after we started it, it began to gain momentum as more and more disallusioned Ideagasms members joined up, eager for a chance to discuss Stephane’s ideas without fear of censorship. Buy zanaflex without prescription, Steph made a shoddy attempt to assuage his followers’ growing sense of doubt by debunking our “grievances”, skipping over most of the important ones and using red herrings and straw-man arguments to make us look bad – not to mention falling back on his “calibration system” as a last resort to prove that we were wrong and he was right. He also made up lies about me and the other founders, which we have no way of responding to on his forum.

Recently he discovered a new tactic that’s quite sneaky: banning people without actually deleting their account. Now if you cross him, he will just change your password so you can’t log in – and to other members, it will appear as if all is peachy and no one’s been kicked out. Brilliant move, cheapest zanaflex price, if I may say so myself.

Oh, and then there are the pills, buy zanaflex without prescription.

Stephane is claiming that he has a secret batch of pills – yes, pills – sitting in his cupboard, which can cure any disease (HIV, cancer, diabetes, kidney stuff, everything), sculpt any body without effort, Discount zanaflex online, and yes, even enlarge your penis (you saw that coming, didn’t you?), which were provided to him secretly by an anonymous, renegade “nano-scientist.” He claims he is one of the very few people on earth with the priviledge of having access to these revolutionary new pills, and for $1,000 a month, he can hook you up with a regimen. As we speak, he is supposedly taking these pills, turning his flabby body into Arnold Schwarzenegger’s, zanaflex pharmacy online. However, there’s just one caveat - the pills won’t work if you “don’t believe in them.” If you take them with “skepticism”, don’t be surprised if they fail to transform you. His actual post can be read on the Ex-IG forum. Buy zanaflex without prescription, Only one person in the whole group had the courage to kindly request that Steph provide evidence of his claims. Steph responded by accusing him of “trying to drag everyone down”, and of spreading the dreaded vibration of “doubt”, which as we know, calibrates below 200, and he banned the guy. Zanaflex rx, Here’s an assortment of nice little quotations from Stephane:

-“Freedom of speech is of no value. If I were to allow people to post anything they wanted, this forum would turn into the next mASF with people posting darkness, misogyny, arrogant positionalities, ego ego ego.” (Feb 23, 2008)

-“Then you have the greeks and italians. I group them into one pile of euro-trash.” (Feb 24, 2008).

-“Latino chicks, from brazil, panama, whatever, buy zanaflex without prescription. Macho, annoying, cheap zanaflex pharmacy, stupid, shallow, tough bitches who fly off the handle and have emotional outbursts for no apparent reason.”

-“Then there's the jews, who secretly think they are special. Yes I’m generalizing, and no I’m not anti-semitic. But the Jews are the biggest poor me victims to ever live on earth, as far as i can tell.”

-“Yes, a lot of people would like "free spech" so they could come on here and post a bunch of fear-based crap and lower the vibe of IG forums.”

-“Gay pride is nothing but arrogance, Cheap zanaflex in canada, and so most of them just wind up getting AIDS.”

-“About the chakras, I know what I know… So, you not seeing the value is obviously pure ego pride, which is an energy not welcome on this forum.”

-“Just know that I'm a lot quicker than you are, and my wisdom exceeds yours significantly. At the end of our debate, I'll need you to say, "Thanks Stephane, for helping to raise my consciousness” – AND, you’ll also have to buy the GTP.”

-“The real answer is they have student/teacher syndrome, in which jealousy and pride prevent them from doing anything other than pathetic little attempts to prove to themselves that they are more evolved than I am, order zanaflex from canada. Buy zanaflex without prescription, It's fallacious.”

“The more enlightened i become, the greater your chances of getting there too, just by
virtue of being in a room with me. I know the way out of hell.”

-“It's up to you to choose to be humble about it and view me as your Teacher, with a capitol “T”. I have earned that level of respect and that title.”

-“I recently made the jump to 602, which is the first stages of true Enlightenment. I am completely un-identified from my mind and body, and could literally choose to walk out of this body and leave for good. I have no more human karma, as i have mastered the linear world of form.”

“My advice to you: SHUT THE FUCK UP.” (April 5, 2008).

* * * * *

So there you have it, buy zanaflex without prescription. Zanaflex for order, That’s my story, and that’s what’s going on behind the doors of the world’s most highly evolved teacher of relationships and spirituality. You can do what you want with this information. If you still want to investigate him, (perhaps you have an overpowering sense of curiosity), go ahead, but be very careful - he is a master NLP user, extremely effective at reframing, rationalizing, and subtle manipulation. If you’re not cautious, zanaflex overnight, you could be helped to several platefuls of mental programming you never signed up for. Buy zanaflex without prescription, He makes liberal use of terms like “love”, “light” and so forth, which might impress a newcomer, but just remember that words are not the same as actions. Some people can preach love and compassion all day long, while in practice suppressing that very thing.

If you’re concerned that Steph may be the only person in the world teaching a blend of pickup and spirituality, rest assured that he’s not. There are many other people on a similar path, and many of the “community” teachers are starting to incorporate more and more of it into their ideas. And ultimately, spirituality is inside you – not outside. It doesn’t come from a guru, buy zanaflex without prescription.

For more information and to discuss this topic, you can visit the Ex-Ideagasmers forum (and this isn’t an advertisement for any products, cause we’re not selling anything). Thanks for reading… and may whatever path you take lead you home.


In addition to all this, it would seem Stephane has also lost his biggest form of social proof - Ghita - very recently.  it would appear that poor girl finally smartened up and dumped his sorry ass.

Check out the email correspondence between David G. and Ghita to confirm the fallout...

Buy zanaflex without prescription, Discussion between David G and Ghita:

E-mail sent on august 22nd:

"Hey Ghita, I heard the great news I imagine your having a lot of mixed emotions right now and I guess thats a natural process. Stephane was a nightmare trip that took us along for the ride, we were both YOUNG, NAIVE and UNAWARE. He was older then us and he used our good hearts against us, I cant imagine what you've been through up to this point. Just let me know if you want me near and ill be there stay strong Angel and dont be afraid you've just entered into your brighter days.

David"

----------

From Ghita Jones (Facebook) August 25 at 7:39pm:

"David,

Stephane and I are no longer together, he did hijack my facebook and my e-mails, I just now got my facebook back, as of 3 min ago.

I read your other e-mails and I don't know what to tell you, how about..you're right, buy zanaflex without prescription. About everything.

I'm with my mom and my brother and my cat. A lot of shit went down.

Hope you're doing alright David.

Sincerely,
Ghita"


So it's pretty much official - Stephane is a psycho.  Stay away, and buyer beware.

Similar posts: Gentamicin eye drops without prescription. Geodon without prescription. Ginseng without prescription. Glucotrol xl without prescription. Glyburide without prescription. Griseofulvin without prescription. Heartgard chewable without prescription. Heartz (medium dogs) without prescription. Heartz (small dogs) without prescription. Himcolin without prescription.
Trackbacks from: Buy zanaflex without prescription. Buy viagra plus without prescription. Buy flucort cream without prescription. Buy prandin online without prescription. Glyburide online without prescription. Buy pyrantel pamoate without prescription. Zithromax online without prescription. Buy shigru without prescription. Furazolidone without prescription. Buy plavix without prescription.

Get Your Free Guide Here!

Comments

615 Responses to “Buy Zanaflex Without Prescription”
  1. Dave S says:

    Ashley,

    you’re showing a lot of balls by what you’re doing.

    there’s a small sect of people here attacking steph. the rest of the comments are like band-wagen “fuk steph” jealousy bullshit.

    its pretty clear to me that you guys are hurt because steph ‘rejected’ you in the sense that he banned you from the forums, and perhaps made you guys doubt yourselves and your intentions. I dont mean that insensitively, but its pretty obvious.

    i was never an active part of the IG forums, but i glanced by every once in a while, and my impression was that stephane was viewed as a ‘guru’ and a ‘leader’ rather than just as a dude who had some shit to teach. so when you found out that steph wasn’t perfect, and that he was actually human, you felt like he let you down, like he deceived or tricked you.

    combine that with him banning you which was basically the same thing as him saying that you’re unintegrous, I would be pissed to. Im not saying you guys are integrous or not, I dont fuking know you. but one thing I know about truly loving people, is that they can find it in their hearts to forgive others who have wronged them, forgive others for their sins and for their humanness.

    so why not make that leap right now? all it takes is one second, and you’re free from all the negativity that comes along with anger and hatred. forget about who’s wrong, who’s integrous, be the better man and forgive.

  2. John says:

    I understand Dave S,

    But people have the right to know. It’s not about Steph’s ego, or the ex-IG’s ego anymore.

  3. E says:

    Dave S, 5. January 2009, 20:36 wrote:

    Ashley…

    …so why not make that leap right now? all it takes is one second, and you’re free from all the negativity that comes along with anger and hatred. forget about who’s wrong, who’s integrous, be the better man and forgive.

    YES.

  4. E says:

    Great comments, Dave S. and Ashley.

  5. john says:

    I dont care about Stephane
    I care about the TEACHINGS
    And I think he does have some good stuff, maybe it’s not from HIM, maybe he read it somewhere else and learn from somebody ELSE, But I DO think that some of his stuff are good, who care if he practice it or not if it’s the truth?

    Who can say that feeling fully emotions and allowing them instead of resisting them is something wrong? nobody

  6. An Observer says:

    There are so many postings here containing smugness and self-righteousness… But wait a minute, aren’t these some of the things that Stephane is accused of? …What gives here, guys? Or, is this a case of some of the ‘(former) students attempting to outdo the (sic) teacher’?

    Guys: Be a man…not a little boy.

    Gals: Be a woman…not a little girl.

    Stephane is a flawed human. (There are many of us around.) We get it.

    Give it up and let it go….

  7. E says:

    TC: Below is what I posted on the ex-IG forum last night. The forum was taken down a short while later; which was a very stand-up thing to do. What I’ve written applies to this thread on your website as well. TC, Please remove this thread from your website. – E

    ————————–

    Please shut down this forum.

    This forum did have its proper time, its place, and its purpose…

    Is S.H. a perfect human being? No, of course not. Does he have his full share, and then some, of imperfections, flaws, egotism, and kookiness…as well as his full share, and then some, of ‘dirty laundry’…?

    Yes, of course. We get it.

    But two ‘wrongs’…do not make a right. They never have.

    Also, as obvious and silly as this next statement may seem, it needs to be stated: S.H. is not a mass murderer, nor is S.H. a serial rapist, etc…; But, these are what the gist and spirit of many of the posts and replies are equating him to…

    Someone new to this site and this topic, who might not know the list of charges against S.H., would most likely easily assume that this guy committed crimes on par with those of Charles Manson and Adolph Hitler…;

    Seriously, guys and gals!?!

    Again…S.H. has not committed acts of mass murder or serial rape… It’s important to realize this…there are REAL AND HUGE DIFFERENCES and distinctions between what these things are…and other kinds of actions and crimes…

    If the phrase “fit the punishment to the crime” is any kind of a reasonable guideline for us to follow in life (assuming that there are times when it’s ‘our duty’ to dole out punishment to someone else), then this site has gone way overboard, in my opinion…

    This is now spiritual warfare…and many posters are clearly hell-bent on character annihilation…

    Maybe because we’re in an internet age…and cold, hard reality can sometimes get confused and mixed up with the ‘virtual world’…acts like being incongruent, being out of integrity, being intolerant of others’ views, being confused, arrogant, bigoted, egotistical, etc, etc…can SEEM as EVIL and can SEEM as DESPICABLE as mass murder, serial rape, etc… But there is a real world out there…and these things are NOT THE SAME things as each other…

    So, again, YES…S.H. has his share of imperfections, flaws, egotism, kookiness, and personal dirty laundry…

    But, let’s think for a sec…what teacher, or public figure, alive today does not have their share of imperfections, flaws, and even dirty laundry…and even a little bit of kookiness thrown in, if we’re really honest and look closely enough…?

    And whether or not the imperfections, flaws, and dirty laundry of any of your favorite teachers or public figures have become public, yet, or not…to think that the case is otherwise… is merely naive… (Yes, of course there are DEGREES of these things, and not everyone is the same out there.)

    Oh, but there was an incident where he hit his ex-girlfriend and he tried to cover it up at first…while he proclaims to be a teacher of ‘unconditional love’…; [But what was the context of that incident? Was she in a rage and threatening to assault him? Of course there's never a good excuse to hit a female, but might you or I possibly ever react in the same manner, and maybe even embarrassingly try to cover it up, at first, afterwards…if our own unique set of triggers and buttons were pushed by another person?]… and he acted like a guru and/or an enlightened one…and he writes kooky posts and emails, and he says kooky things, and he doesn’t tolerate dissenting view points, and he banned lots of dissenters from his forum….and he hardly ever did any ‘cold approaches’…and he stole 10 bottles of wine…and he talked badly about a family member…and he didn’t adequately cite the sources of the material that he taught…and he accused numerous people of being of ‘lower consciousness’ than him…and, he drank lots of liquor and did drugs, and, and….

    None of the above reasons or arguments…however strong…really is a legitimate excuse for relentless public bashing and trashing of another human being…

    In Mexico City a few years ago, a neighborhood was being plagued with a rash of child kidnappings… many people were frustrated because they felt that the government wasn’t doing enough to investigate and attempt to apprehend the perpetrators…one day, when some townspeople spotted two men taking photographs outside the fence of a local school, they immediately grabbed the two men and beat them and murdered them… (Aside: The two men who were murdered by the mob were federal agents, who were working undercover and attempting to investigate the local cases.)

    This is but one of many similar examples of how humans act sometimes towards their fellow man, when they are overcome with vengeance, rage, hatred, and righteous indignation…

    But it does not HAVE to be this way…. We do not HAVE to act like (actual or virtual) wolves, apes, or cannibals to each other…

    As HUMANS, we can make a choice to deal with those people who we think are evil and who we believe have severely hurt us or others, in a different manner than in the above example, and in a different manner than what is now taking place on these websites…we can instead make a more difficult, courageous, and mature choice…which is to refrain from the natural urges to exact our own personal ‘sweet’ revenge… and to vent our own personal hatred and animosity publicly towards another person…NO MATTER WHAT their crimes or alleged crimes…and, to instead use legitimate and appropriate means of ensuring that someone who we believe is guilty of crimes is brought to justice and punished appropriately…(i.e., the legal system).

    I’ll repeat this again…this forum did have its proper time, its place, and its purpose…yet it has morphed and is filling up with maliciousness…

    I put out a sincere call and plea to you to take down this forum….

    Genuine disagreement and dissent with another’s viewpoints should be freely shared and tolerated, OF COURSE (and even though I didn’t agree with it, however, it was S.H.’s right to ban whoever he wanted to from his forum…after all, it was his forum)…

    However…persistent, vicious persecution and attacks on another human being are something entirely different…. And have no place on the internet, or anywhere else in decent society….

    If anyone has any further need to discuss their problems with S.H., let them contact him directly, via his website.

    And for those who feel the continued urge to ‘warn’ and ‘protect’ current, former, and future would-be customers of his…then there are appropriate and legitimate ways of airing grievances about a person or a business…that DO NOT need to involve spreading salacious gossip…and that do not need to be accompanied by maliciousness and personal vindictiveness…

    Again, please close this forum down…

    I ask that all other concerned readers join me now in this call to shut it down…; Please don’t remain silent… I can’t, in any good conscience remain silent about this any longer…

    If anything I’ve said has ‘spoken’ to you, please join me in this plea…

    And please, if you’re a praying person, I ask that you join me:

    - Pray sincerely, every day, for S.H.…and that this shameless persecution would end… also, pray for S.H.’s healing and forgiveness…

    - Please also pray of course for Greta; and pray for the spiritual and emotional healing of Ghita, AJ, Jas-n, and others that are in need of it…

    (End of excerpt…)
    ———————————————

    To TC and other readers of this thread on Thundercat’s site:

    For those who still feel the continued urge to ‘pile-on’ to the posts on this thread and join in with the joyous ‘Stephane-bashing’…I sincerely ask you…to control the urge…

    Maybe consider doing something that actually takes some *courage* and some *guts*… and that’s to go right now and take a long, hard, cold look at yourself in your nearest mirror….and ask yourself the following:

    What things might ‘I’ be “projecting” about ‘myself’ onto S.H. or even onto someone else “out there”…which ‘I’ might possibly need to take some ownership of myself…? Might ‘integrity’ be an issue for me, and maybe I’m not confronting it within myself? How about ‘congruence’?

    Sometimes…it’s so easy for us to see the flaws in others around us and then direct our energy and time trying to *purge* the world of those other ‘evil doers’… when sometimes it may be the ‘lens’ that we’re looking out of which may be making the world appear the way it does for us… Also, if we want so badly and urgently for S.H. and for others to get this message…then maybe it’s a sign that WE also need this message JUST AS URGENTLY…

    - E

  8. Simple Jack says:

    You m-m-m-m-m-m-m-m-m-make me happy

  9. Tuplad says:

    Please don’t take this post down, people need to know the truth.

  10. BigSend says:

    Big Mike,

    You said:

    “So what, you got ripped off by a fkin cokehead who doesnt practice what he preaches. The message is still alright; there’s nothing negative in it. Let it go. Let him go, forgive him for his sins, and I bet you’ll feel better and more at peace.”

    This is where our philosophies differ. I feel anyone who teaches life improvement has to, on some decent level, walk-the-walk. That is part of my ethical code which I live by. Unless you do state “I can’t walk-the-walk on this one, but I know from others that _______ is true”

    Basically, you are saying Stephane plagiarized other teachings just so he could get money while still leading a destructive life.

    To take a step back, have you studied Existentialism? It’s a powerful philosophy which basically says we are judged fully by our actions, not our words. “Existentialism is a philosophical movement which posits that individuals create the meaning and essence of their lives, as opposed to it being created for them by deities or authorities or defined for them by philosophical or theological doctrines.” –Wikipedia.

    My point is this, my personal philosophy is that even if someone does say good things on the surface, if their actions contradict their words, then there is no “so-what” it means that person can’t be trusted.

    Anyway, I do think Stephane is getting more than his fair-share of ass whooping on here, but then again Stephane keeps acknowledging us as evil on this own newsletters/blog so he is reigniting the flames.

    And I do forgive him. But… I am backing up my points. I also don’t want new liars and cheats trying to teach guys how to pick up. This is quality control, Mike. Hopefully the other bad PUA teachers you have learned from will go down too (whomever they are).

    As an aside, I do think AMP is good PUA Company. Check them out.

    -BigSend
    http://bigsendworld.com

  11. Anon says:

    How often it is that the angry man rages denial of what his inner self is telling him.

  12. John says:

    “My point is this, my personal philosophy is that even if someone does say good things on the surface, if their actions contradict their words, then there is no “so-what” it means that person can’t be trusted.”

    A-M-E-N !!!

    “And I do forgive him. But… I am backing up my points. I also don’t want new liars and cheats trying to teach guys how to pick up. This is quality control, Mike. Hopefully the other bad PUA teachers you have learned from will go down too (whomever they are).”

    Exactly !

    Nice post Bigsend !!

  13. Seriously says:

    MORAL OF THE STORY:

    “even if someone does say good things on the surface, if their actions contradict their words, then there is no “so-what” it means that person can’t be trusted.”

  14. Brittany says:

    TO: E.. to my post on jan 3 and urs on jan 4th…

    I love my brother, stephane. More than anyone and more than anyone could ever understand!! We have unconditional love for eachother and if you didnt read my post properly, i was sticking up for him! and I was getting upset at the people who are bashing him! You missunderstood my point. And to add something, my uncle, the one that ‘dislikes’ steph.. his problem, i dont like that he does that to steph -AT ALL- but it’s not my choice, unfortunatly i dont make peoples desicions.
    Love,
    Brittany.

  15. Brittany says:

    Take this down.

  16. Tuplad says:

    Brittany, fuck off. If we need to have unconditional love for him, then we’ll have it for ourselves too.

  17. E says:

    E, 4. January 2009, 1:51 wrote:

    “First of all, to see the family members (sister excepted) earlier in this thread…”

    Brittany, 6. January 2009, 23:46 wrote:

    “TO: E.. to my post on jan 3 and urs on jan 4th…

    I love my brother, stephane. More than anyone and more than anyone could ever understand!! We have unconditional love for each other and if you didnt read my post properly, i was sticking up for him!”

    ————————————-

    Brittany,

    Hi. Sorry if my post was unclear. I stated “sister excepted” in my post, meaning you were the exception among the other family members who have posted here. Your post clearly showed love, support, and understanding for your brother, Stephane…whereas the posts of the others seemed to show maliciousness and personal vindictiveness…

    This is not to say that the others should not have the feelings and the opinions which they have. Everyone has a right to their opinions and their feelings. It’s just that it is sad to see the things that were written by these other family members on a public forum.

    There are much bigger and more mature ways to handle grievances among family members (as well as among former students and customers of a person), that don’t have to involve spreading and inciting gossip and that don’t have to involve maliciousness and vindictiveness…

    I think that people posting here on this thread are acting out of what they think is in the best interest (e.g., to send S.H. a ‘strong message’; to warn or protect current and future would-be customers, etc).

    I understand that.

    Thanks though, Brittany, for posting on this thread, and for showing there’s another way to treat a human being….and for showing that there’s always more than one side to everything in life.

    :0)

  18. R says:

    Hello guys!

    Come on, didn’t you notice that “E” is in reality Stephane. I’m surprised no one said it before.
    I have no judgements of what’s happening. People should be intelligent enough to make their own decisions. Personnally, I don’t think Stephane is really integrous. He may have good teachings, but we can clearly see that his source of revenue is threaten by this blog and that drives him crazy ( that’s not good for a Teacher, Stephane, your level of conciousness has certainly dropped by a few hundreds :-o ). Otherwise, I think anyone may want to be a Teacher. If he’s able to do it and he find (maybe not so intelligent) followers, let it be.

    With love,

    R

  19. A1 says:

    One good thing that has come out of this is that I have learned about several other companies and products that look interesting. I always had a vibe that Stephane was not the real deal. Whenever he suggested something of interest like Chakras, I would always go to another source to actually learn about the thing in question. I was not that surprised to learn that his squirting massage technique was literally lifted from another program, named “White Tiger Tantra” or something like that. Oh well.

  20. Snooze says:

    I think it’s unfortunate that Steph/Greta/Britanny have to suffer more from this…

  21. ExIG2 says:

    New Ex-Iger’s forum!

    http://z13.invisionfree.com/exideagasmers2/index.php?

    Please be patient while the details and semantics are worked out… it may take the weekend to get this thing put together, but until then you are allowed to come and post as you please.

    P.S. This forum will be quite different than the old ex-IGers forum. There will be guidelines (which will be laid out later) but there will also be a different emphasis in direction.

    With Metta

  22. ExIG2 says:

    P.S. The new ex-IG forums is a place where we can discuss and/or dismiss Steph’s “Ideas” rather than him as a person. This forum is not interested in Stephane Hemon as a person, period.
    However, his ideas and behaviors, former and present, are freely allowed to be discussed.

    P.S.S. As long as there are people showing interest in the new forum, there will be new ideas and new forums dedicated to topics you would like to be a part of (for example, there will be a food and health section). Keep in mind if you are sensitive to opposing viewpoints, this forum, much like the “REAL WORLD”, will have plenty of assholes surrounding it. I encourage you to acknowledge their criticism, move on, and learn the ancient practice of letting go.

  23. E says:

    R,

    Hi. No, I’m not Stephane. I’m just someone who’s very saddened to see what’s happening publicly to him here on this thread on TC’s site (which many of us would like to see TC remove from this website). Also, I’m just trying to keep some anonymity, like you, by using an initial.

    If you email me I can give you a phone number where you can reach me, so you can confirm this if you’d like. I’ve created a temporary email you can reach me at, which I’ve listed below. Feel free to use a temporary email yourself, also, when you write; and when you call, feel free to call from a public phone.

    Also, I live in the So. California area, so if you’re anywhere near here, I could meet you at a Starbucks of your choice, if you want, so you can confirm my identity.

    Either way, just let me know, man. Thanks.

    Best regards,

    - E

    Temporaryemail_until_Jan12_09@yahoo.com

  24. Bob says:

    E – you’re a weirdo. Why do you care so much?

  25. E says:

    Bob, 8. January 2009, 15:56 wrote:

    “E…. ”

    —————————————————-

    Bob,

    It’s a fair question. I think Snooze summed it up pretty well, in this statement:

    Snooze, 7. January 2009, 14:56 wrote:

    “I think it’s unfortunate that Steph/Greta/Britanny have to suffer more from this…”

    —————————————————-

    T………, 7. January 2009, 2:02 wrote:

    “Brittany, fuck off. If we need to have unconditional love for him, then we’ll have it for ourselves too.”

    —————————————————-

    What would cause someone to write something like this to another person, who wasn’t harming them in any way and was merely showing support and love for her brother?

    Thundercat: Please realize the need to take this thread down from your website.

    - E

  26. captainmorgan says:

    Leave this up. Eventually the thread will die, but if anyone decides to sign up for Ideagasms, they will read the reviews from other people who were not just disappointed, but disgusted by Stephane and Ideagasms.

    Asking TC to take this down is like asking Amazon.com to delete negative ratings on products because “it spreads hate”. Might as well ask McGraw-Hill to delete the slavery periods from the history books. Criticism is not the same as slander/libel, and not all criticism HAS to be constructive.

    If anything, disable further comments/lock the thread. But PLEASE leave it up as a record of what was discussed. If asked to take it down, write about what happened, because THAT would definitely not fall under the category of libel/slander. (E.G. “A lot of followers from Ideagasms were sorely disappointed with Stephane when he shifted from a man who offered spiritually-infused pickup and relationship advice to what seemed like an arrogant cult leader, banning anyone from his forums who dared question him or his theories.” That’s not libel, that’s JOURNALISM! :) Shit… there needs to be a Wikipedia page about all of this controversy – Wikipedia articles are flagged and reviewed so that they are mostly factual and objective rather than opinionated and subjective. Saying what a lot of people thought is not the same as saying what you personally think… and there is the loophole around libel/slander.

  27. Dave S says:

    Do you ever see on amazon people saying, that book by so and so sucks because the author is a cult leader and he steals wine and beats his gf. uh no. they talk about the content of the book. what do you guys not get about attacking someone’s character? you think just because there’s speculation about it, people have a “right to know”. you guys are all “protecting the world from steph’s evil”. what a load of self-indulgent crap. This is what Relativism is and its the reason the internet is such a load of shit. You’re not protecting the world from anything. You’re just flattering your own egos thinking that ur doing such a fuking good deed when your good intentions to help others just stems from bullsht like anger, jealousy and feelings of rejections.

    Now lets all sit back and watch while religious fanatics “protect the world from our evil”.

  28. captainmorgan says:

    Critical analysis includes not just the information, but the source.

    Is it wrong to attack someone’s character? It depends. For some reason, these people feel wronged by their former teacher, and are presenting examples of his behavior. What’s worse is that those examples are in stark contrast to what he preaches.

    Religion, loosely defined, is a collection of thoughts or ideas that one subscribes to. Not a bad thing. Unfortunately, subscribing to any collection of thought without critical analysis makes you a fanatic rather than a believer.

    I don’t know Stephane. Maybe people have the right impression, maybe they have the wrong one. It’s easy to look at things in black and white when you’re sure you’re on the good side. Unfortunately, both Stephane and the people who feel wronged are at opposite ends of the spectrum.

    The downside about becoming a public figure, even a small one like in the seduction community, means you are putting your thoughts out there and your behaviors and subjecting them to criticism.

    Asking people not to criticize something they don’t like is asking them to suppress their opinion. You may think that’s great, but then to be fair, you would have to suppress yours, and Stephane would have to take down his website (full of his own personal opinions and beliefs), and so would everyone else on the internet.

    I wouldn’t worry about defending Stephane – he believes what he believes and preaches what he wants, as countless other authors will do. And sure enough, there are people who will identify with it and join his belief system.

    On the other hand, if someone is looking for quality relationship, sex, or seduction teaching, they have a right to hear from the critics as well as the fans of anyone claiming to be a teacher. Almost every “guru” has been criticized. Some of them used it to evolve, some of them kept doing what they wanted to do, but this is the only time I’ve seen someone promise to “wage war” against anyone that isn’t on their side. Kind of ridiculous. So people don’t believe in your teacher – big deal, you still do, so who cares?

    Criticism of something does one of two things. It either causes people to step back and look at the object in question a little more thoroughly, or it causes them to believe even deeper. Some people, when questioning their religion, will find it is either a load of crap, or that it is so much deeper than what they originally thought. Either decision is fine, as the decision is a personal one. But suppressing criticism usually indicates something sinister – as if the criticism hurts so deeply because on some level, the one being criticized knows it is true.

    You can’t crusade against anyone who doesn’t believe what you believe. Nations have done that in the past, and now we have come to see how ignorant that kind of thinking is. Unfortunately, there are still many people who think that way, and are never willing to accept that they might be wrong – even in the face of overwhelming criticism. To be fair, sometimes this has been men of genius who did things people said couldn’t be done, and sometimes this has been sociopaths who had no concept of empathy for another person.

    The point here, is that it’s not just Stephane’s ideas that are being criticized, it’s the conflict between what he preaches, what he practices, and his attitudes toward his followers. I’m sure if he were less arrogant in his approach, and less sensitive to criticism, he would probably have a lot more followers.

    But this falls on deaf ears. There is no reasoning with people who are emotionally invested in an idea. There is also no reasoning with crazy people. For all we have learned in the seduction community and the self-help industry, everyone thinks they are above cognitive dissonance or rationalization. How wrong we are.

    Since Stephane and his followers are attempting to suppress rather than discuss criticism of his behaviors and attitude toward former students (with the exception of one or two of you), then it seems to be like they have given up reason and social courtesy for faith – in essence, a cult.

    But, as the saying goes… arguing on the internet is like running in the special olympics. Even if you win, you’re still retarded. Hats off to all you retards. :)

  29. captainmorgan says:

    And yes, I know I’m a retard as well.

  30. Tuplad says:

    captainmorgan, that’s like… the best post so far. You put it well ;)

  31. E says:

    captainmorgan, 10. January 2009, 5:10 wrote:

    “..not all criticism HAS to be constructive….”

    ———————————-

    But I wonder why not?

    What is the point of destructive criticism? I know, the question answers itself. To attempt to destroy. A person, his soul, his life…

    Dont you think it’s important at all, captainmorgan…to see a difference between ‘constructive criticism’…. and spreading gossip, airing ‘dirty laundry’, allowing stories to morph into half-truths and lies, & acting out of viciousness and maliciousness…. which comes from hatred, vengeance, and hurt?

    - E

  32. jtv says:

    Captainmorgan, you just stated a reason why the ENTIRE seduction community should burn to the ground.

    As for E/Stephane/Rasputin. Are you fully aware that you are endorsing/running a cult? Cults serve only 1 perpose. Personal gain be it through money, power, influence.

    I would never wish anything bad on You/Stephane, but its clear his/your time is up and will only be a matter of time.

  33. required says:

    the new forum is closed …as i saw.
    http://z13.invisionfree.com/exideagasmers2/index.php?

    anyone who can create a new forum ?
    we shouldnt give up the idea of a free forum without monarch censorship…

  34. Rasputin says:

    Charles Manson interview:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cijfMQuiB_s&feature=related

    just watch how one can justify anything

    I’m not saying Stephane is like Charles Manson, by the way

    but I’m saying that even the worst people still believe they’re good

  35. jtv says:

    BTW Rasputin (The user)- If you really are a user called “Rasputin” and not Stephane in drag my post wasnt aimed at you personally. I liken Stephane to Rasputin (the Russian mad monk) because of his negative bullshit holy ways.
    As for the worst people believing they are still good, well thats because in thier version of reality they have gotten to a point where they have lied so much (In Stephane’s case) and really believe in the lie.
    Its these kind of people that should be put in a asylum (Like Stephane) for our safety, and to genuinely get help for his mental problem.
    If/When he comes out of the asylum, then he can rethink his life without all the Ice, Stolen wine-bottles, bullshit beliefs that serve to hurt hanging over his sholders.
    Only then can he come out and say “I fucked up guys, im sorry for all the shit i put you through and IdeaGasms will cease to exist”.
    If he came out and said that, i can GARANTEE that all of you would actually have ALOT more respect for this guy 1.Admitting what you did was wrong 2.Apologizing in a genuine way 3.Putting things right.

    It takes a real man to admit that they have a problem (Drink, drugs, gambling ect), until Stephane can do that, and check himself in. He wont be a real man until then. And no, Real men dont put on a front.

  36. jtv says:

    Aditional, i mantain my belief that the WHOLE seduction community is one bad idea. But this page shouldnt be about attacking Stephane, but trying to help him to help us.
    Yes, he has ALOT to answer for. but mindless attacking isnt the way forward.

  37. captainmorgan says:

    @E:
    You have a good point. It would be great if all criticism was constructive. Realize, however, that finding a constructive use for criticism isn’t the responsibility of the one doing the criticizing, but the one being criticized.

    There is a difference between pessimism, “realistic” cynicism, optimism, idealism, and realism. It would be IDEAL if society was like that. But unless you and I are in any position to change society right now, we must deal with society using majority rules. So must Stephane.

    See the world as it is, not as you want it to be. If you must change it, however, be an example of the change you wish to see. This is where Stephane has fallen short.

    @JTV:
    What’s the reason that the Seduction Industry is a bad idea? Everything starts out with good intentions – religion, politics, government. It’s only once a few people pervert the original principles that it becomes distasteful. Look at the self-help industry – there’s a LOT of bullshit floating around, but for every 9 bullshit concepts there’s 1 great one that actually helps. Both industries are somewhat of a religion. But not all religious people are mindless fanatics – some people pick and choose the concepts that are relevant to their lives, and discard the rest. It’s when we give up rational thought and personal responsibility that we develop sociopathic tendencies.

    The Seduction Industry doesn’t just involve mASF and everything that followed after. Before then, there were books, magazines, newspaper columns, etc. As long as we continue to have sex, and derive self esteem from being attractive, we will always want to know more about how to increase that attraction and consequently get more sex. Love is a factor, too, but being attractive opens up more opportunities for that.

    I guess it all comes down to the point of this expose. Most of the people here are venting, because they have tried to work out their differences to no avail.

    Have you ever been to the BBB or Ripoffreport.com? How is filing a claim on there any different than publicly venting/blogging about a disappointing experience with a self-appointed Love Guru? Companies know about it, and some of them attempt to settle the claims of disgruntled customers… but for others, the reports just pile up. Stephane needs to make a decision on how he’s going to fix this – and it appears he already has.

  38. Tuplad says:

    Check this new joke out, dude is running out of money… I think somebody is going have to work soon!

    http://www.ideagasms.net/your-very-own-personal-newsletter/

  39. clevarity says:

    David B is the scum of this earth in my opinion. Its obvious his fragile little ego got hurt when Stephane cut him off. I do believe alot that he said but for an individual to expend so much energy into trying to ruin somebody is just sad. I can just feel his ego saying the following:

    1. I created you and your forum
    2. If it wasn’t for me you wouldn’t be where your are today
    3. You think you can just get rid of me as easy as that.

    Infact, he reminds me of my wife (seperated). Deep down she believes she created me and ever since our break up she will do anything in her power to destroy me.

    David B needs to get over himself. “People don’t get hurt; only egos”.

    If i was a friend of David B I would watch my back.
    With friends like that who needs enemies.

    “Lord please, protect me from my friends while i try to protect myself from my enemies”

    When all is said and done i am quite confident that this all will backfire on David B.

    clevarity
    Nassau Bahamas.
    clevarity@yahoo.com

    credit card # 1000 2000 3000 4000 LOL

  40. E says:

    Replies to Comments by captainmorgan, who wrote on 13. January 2009, 12:40:

    “It would be great if all criticism was constructive. ”

    - Yes, it would.

    “….finding a constructive use for criticism isn’t the responsibility of the one doing the criticizing, but the one being criticized.”

    - This is true. But when the criticism is intentionally meant to destroy a person’s spirit and life, then trying to find a constructive use for it becomes much more challenging (although, not impossible, in my opinion).

    “See the world as it is, not as you want it to be.”

    - Why can’t we do both?

    “If you must change it, however, be an example of the change you wish to see.”

    - This is excellent advice.

    This is where Stephane has fallen short.

    - Honestly, we’ve all fallen short.

    ———————————————————————-

    clevarity, 14. January 2009, 2:53 wrote:

    “Lord please, protect me from my friends while i try to protect myself from my enemies.”

    - Sad, but how true. I think this is the most profound statement on this blog’s thread.

    (PS: Clevarity – You could have made your good points, without the rancor. God forbid that
    people go off soon and start a David B.-bashing blog/forum.)

    - E

  41. clevarity says:

    “(PS: Clevarity – You could have made your good points, without the rancor. God forbid that
    people go off soon and start a David B.-bashing blog/forum.)” by E.

    Your right E

    nuff respect 4 da I dem.

  42. James says:

    Would you take driving lessons from a man who cannot drive?

    Of course not.

    Would you learn about unconditional love from a man who goes nuts and repeatedly calls his ex-girlfriends “whores” on his website?

    If you don’t think it’s important that any would-be customer should have access to that information then you are crazy.

  43. GetYourMoneyBack! says:

    I’ve been quite satisfied with Stéphane’s products until I bought his latest, which is a total waste of money in my opinion. For those who are as dissatisfied as I, please consider the demand for reimbursement that I just sent off a few minutes ago. Here it is, verbatim.

    To: stephane@ideaGasms.net
    Subject: Demand for reimbursement

    Hello Stéphane,

    It has been ten days since my email of 5 Jan 2009 (attached for your convenience), and I still have not received a reply from you. Hence this email will be more direct.

    I am severely dissatisfied with your “Cracking the M/F Code Vol. 3″ product. You have grossly misrepresented it and charged way too much (US$250) for what simply amounts to more of what I have already purchased from you (that being Volumes 1 and 2).

    [1] You state in the product description that “We recommend that you own the first two Cracking The M/F Code volumes before investing in this program.” Yet Volume 3 is simply a re-hash of Volumes 1 and 2.

    [2] You state in the product description that “the additional audio portion is about 4 hours.” The audio portion I received is less than two hours, about half of what you claim.

    You also state that “all sales are final,” but this does not relieve you of the duty to accurately and honestly represent your product to potential buyers.

    You therefore have 72 hours from the timestamp of this email to credit my PayPal account (account@witheld.com) the full purchase amount of US$250. If you do not, I will file a PayPal dispute (and it’s not my first time) and allow PayPal to decide if you do indeed operate an honest business.

    Oh, and don’t bother rushing to your webmaster to have the offending claims removed from your website. I’ve just saved PDF versions for PayPal’s benefit.

    Govern yourself accordingly,

    (name witheld)

    Those who have bought Stephane’s recent products and are dissatisfied with them might find the above a useful template for their own complaints. And you can learn more about PayPal’s dispute resolution process at
    https://www.paypal.com/ca/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=xpt/CaseManagement/customerservice/EducationBuyerOverview

    If you’re as disappointed with Stephane as I am, don’t waste your time bitching on blogs like this one. Hit him where it counts… his wallet.

    Blessings and good luck,

    …GetYourMoneyBack!

  44. GetYourMoneyBack! says:

    It has just come to my attention that the PayPal dispute-resolution link in the posting above works only if you have ALREADY logged into PayPal. If it doesn’t work for you, open a new browser window, go to http://www.paypal.com and log in, and then return to this window and click on https://www.paypal.com/ca/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=xpt/CaseManagement/customerservice/EducationBuyerOverview

  45. Anon says:

    This is what is called “Karmic reprisal” is it not?

    The law of opposites etc.

  46. Dave S says:

    Hey E,

    Are you still using that email you provided a few posts ago? I wanted to ask you something.

    Dave

  47. GetYourMoneyBack! says:

    A few hours after sending the “Demand for Reimbursement” above, Stephane sent me an apology and a full refund for my US$250. Clearly, he’s not as “non-integrous” as many posters here would like to believe.

    “Anon,” this is not exactly “karmic reprisal.” Stéphane likes to say that 85% of the world (and 55% of America) is “below the integrity line.” Flip that around, and 45% of the USA is *above* the integrity line. We have laws, we have courts, and PayPal has a dispute resolution process. These are all places of integrity where facts and the truth are uncovered, and lies and falsehoods come to light — as long as you’re willing to shoulder the burden of proof.

    What disturbed me the most about Stephane’s Volume 3 product was not only that it re-hashed Volumes 1 and 2 so much, but did so in a far more negative fashion, harping on everyone being “below the integrity line.” This is indeed a very unhealthy way to view the world, and can have a damaging effect on all of your relationships.

    As it seems to have had on Stephane’s own relationships recently… Anon, perhaps therein lies your “karmic reprisal?”

    The world is your mirror, indeed.

  48. Tuplad says:

    GetYourMoneyBack!: because of one good deed, you don’t make up all the bad deeds. He never been bad with the refunding, altough I’ve seen him bashing people on the forum long enough so their refund time would expire. He would argue and argue and ask “for a valid point” to refund them.

  49. E says:

    Dave S, 16. January 2009, 0:23 wrote:

    “Hey E,

    Are you still using that email you provided a few posts ago? I wanted to ask you something.”

    ———————————————————–

    Dave S,

    I stopped checking that email’s inbox after Jan 12th (no one ever wrote)…however, I’ll go ahead and start checking it again during the next two days if you want to get in touch with me.

    Regards,

    - E

  50. Anonymous says:

    M- Steph is good about reimbursing. he will reimburse; i will say almost 99.9% of the time and even give his products away for free; if there are any problems. So yeah, he isn’t completely evil. hee hee :)

    But does he live what he teaches?? His past behavior would suggest that he does NOT.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

*